Reginald L. Gundy v. City of Jacksonville, Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the truncated recitation of the test in Warren “does not remove ‘not cumulative, impeaching, or doubtful’ from what must be proved”
• explaining that the expressio unius canon is only justified when the language of the statute supports an inference that the omission was intentional
• stating that “limited trial preparation” does not establish inadequate representation; the focus is on the adversarial process not the defendant’s assessment of counsel’s preparation
• explaining that the expressio unius canon is only justified when the language of the statute supports an inference that the omission was intentional
• affirming conviction of aiding and abetting first-degree premeditated murder for the benefit of a gang based on transferred intent
• \We will not supply words that the Legislature either purposely omitted or inadvertently left out.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).