Reginald Gilliam v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “the FMLA does not provide for leave on short notice when longer notice readily could have been given”
• finding proper termination where employee failed to call in accordance with a collective bargaining agreement
• \Nothing in the FMLA or the implementing regulations prevents an employer from enforcing a rule requiring employees on FMLA leave to keep the employer informed about the employee's plans.\
• “[T]he FMLA does not provide for leave on short notice when longer notice readily could have been given.”
• employee that failed to report to work for three consecutive days without notifying company, in violation of governing collective bargaining agreement, could not prevail on interference claim
• “But it does not follow [from the fact that neither party needs to mention the FMLA for the employee to be on FMLA leave] that all family leave must be under the FMLA unless the employer negates that possibility by imposing a 30-day delay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).