Reggie Elliott v. El Paso Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where “Plantiffs’ underlying claims fail as a matter of law, . . . Plaintiffs’ punitive-damages claims also fail”
• under the MPLA, \a plaintiff making a design-defect claim must prove by the preponderance of the evidence the existence of a feasible design alternative\
• “{t]o the extent that Plaintiffs purport to make common-law negligence or strict liability claims based on damages caused by [the product], we find that those claims fail as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).