Skip to main content
· 6/25/2020

Regents of the University of Cal. v. Pub. Employment Relations Bd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • so concluding where “at the time of the interview [the defendant] had been handcuffed and taken to the front porch. As a result, [the] interrogation was custodial[.]”
  • testimony regarding Pinson's silence in response to a specific question from police was direct comment on silence that prosecutor exploited by arguing that the silence was \evidence of his guilt.\
  • prosecutor improperly used defendant’s silence during a 8 custodial interrogation as evidence of guilt
  • prosecutor improperly used defendant’s silence during a custodial interrogation as evidence of guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.