Skip to main content
· 6/18/1997

Regent Insurance Co. v. Estes Co.

Citations

  • 564 N.W.2d 846
  • 1997 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 183
  • 1997 WL 332272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding summary judgment ruling based on interpretation of insurance policy urged in the district court but not relied on by that court
  • restating “well-established” proposition that appellee may seek to save judgment on alternative basis presented to the trial court
  • restating “well-established” proposition that appellee may seek to save judgment on alternative basis presented to the trial court
  • restating “well-established” proposition that an appellee may seek to save a judgment on an alternative basis presented to the trial court
  • interpreting coverage for additional insured to be limited to policy provision requiring the liability to arise out of subcontractor’s work for general contractor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larson, Carter, Snell, Andreasen, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.