· 7/25/2007
Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of West Hollywood
Citations
- 63 Cal. Rptr. 3d 287
- 153 Cal. App. 4th 825
- 2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1223
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an outdoor advertising company did not have standing because it had no beneficial interest and was urging CEQA review to pursue its commercial interests against competitors
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rubin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.