Skip to main content
· 1/31/1997

Regency Advantage Ltd. Partnership v. Bingo Idea-Watauga, Inc.

Citations

  • 936 S.W.2d 275
  • 1996 WL 391174

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statement was not clear, deliberate, and unequivocal so as to constitute a judicial admission
  • holding that statement was not clear, deliberate, and unequivocal so as to constitute a judicial admission
  • holding that statement was not clear, deliberate, and unequivocal so as to constitute a judicial admission
  • holding that statement was not clear, deliberate, and unequivocal so as to constitute judicial admission
  • holding that statement was not clear, deliberate, and unequivocal so as to constitute a judicial admission
  • holding that statement was not clear, deliberate, and unequivocal so as to constitute a judicial admission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.