· 1/31/1997
Regency Advantage Ltd. Partnership v. Bingo Idea-Watauga, Inc.
Citations
- 936 S.W.2d 275
- 1996 WL 391174
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that statement was not clear, deliberate, and unequivocal so as to constitute a judicial admission
- holding that statement was not clear, deliberate, and unequivocal so as to constitute a judicial admission
- holding that statement was not clear, deliberate, and unequivocal so as to constitute a judicial admission
- holding that statement was not clear, deliberate, and unequivocal so as to constitute judicial admission
- holding that statement was not clear, deliberate, and unequivocal so as to constitute a judicial admission
- holding that statement was not clear, deliberate, and unequivocal so as to constitute a judicial admission
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.