Refinery Equipment, Inc. v. Wickett Refining Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that California’s anti-subrogation statute regulated insurance
• finding that 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(2) provides for nation- wide personal jurisdiction
• applying federal choice of law rules to action under ERISA, while noting that state choice of law rules would yield same result
• affirming nationwide personal jurisdiction for an analogous ERISA provision, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(2)
• adopting Restatement as matter of federal common law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).