Reeves v. UPSON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissal of an appeal because order challenged was interlocutory is law of the case and cannot be revisited
• “[W]hen we consider the meaning of a statute, we always must presume that the General Assembly means what it says and says what it means, and an unambiguous statute must be afforded its plain meaning.”
• “[W]hen we consider the meaning of a statute, we always must presume that the General Assembly means what it says and says what it means, and an unambiguous statute must be afforded its plain meaning.”
• third party upon whom the plaintiff in the underlying action served a subpoena requiring the production of documents was not entitled to recover under OCGA § 9-15-14 (b) because they were not a party to the lawsuit
• “[W]hen we consider the meaning of a statute, we always must presume that the General Assembly means what it says and says what it means, and an unambiguous statute must be afforded its plain meaning.” (citation and punctuation omitted)
• “[W]hen we consider the meaning of a statute, we always must presume that the General Assembly means what it says and says what it means, and an unambiguous statute must be afforded its plain meaning” (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).