Reeves v. Towery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The question to be answered in this case is not what the grantors may have intended to say in the deed, but the meaning of what they did, in fact, say.”
• “The question to be answered in this case is not what the grantors may have intended to say in the deed, but the meaning of what they did, in fact, say.”
• “The question to be answered in this case is not what the grantors may have intended to say in the deed, but the meaning of what they did, in fact, say.”
• “The question to be answered in 9 this case is not what the grantors may have intended to say in the deed, but the meaning of what they did, in fact, say.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).