Skip to main content
· 4/19/2017

Reeves v. Plett

Citations

  • 284 Or. App. 852
  • 395 P.3d 977
  • 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The appellant cannot be entitled to the benefit of the doubt here because there are two claimants in this case. The benefit of the doubt cannot be given to both.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Egan, Lagesen, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.