Skip to main content
· 1/19/1989

Reeves v. Digital Equipment Corp.

Citations

  • 710 F. Supp. 675
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4734
  • 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,681
  • 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 526
  • 1989 WL 43559

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “as a matter of law, three months is too long to support an inference of retaliation”
  • no retaliation where three months passed between protected expression and adverse employment action
  • no retaliation where three months passed between protected expression and adverse employment action
  • no retaliation where three months passed between protected expression and adverse employment action
  • no causal connection after three months lapsed between protected expression and adverse action
  • no retaliation where three months passed between protected expression and adverse employment action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Battisti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.