Reeves v. Barrett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting district court's post-trial finding that “it is clear from credible and persuasive evidence that plaintiff would not have been selected during the later stages of the pilot selection process.”
• upholding a related aspect of the then-extant version of American’s up-or-out policy under which it would not hire anyone over the age of 30 to be a flight officer
• “the best experience an American Captain can have is acquired by flying American aircraft in American’s three cockpit positions. Thus, the safest Captain will be experienced, and as much of that experience as possible will have been with American.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).