Reese's Admr. v. Youtsey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a motion to intervene to be untimely because the proposed intervenor waited 17 months to seek to intervene since notice of interest
• finding that the timeliness requirement is not met when proposed “intervenor[s] attempt to introduce collateral issues in a proceeding” (quotation and citation omitted)
• denying a secured lender’s motion to intervene because it was being timely paid on its loans despite an asset freeze was imposed in the action
• “Nevertheless, RBS Citizens waited a year and five months to seek to intervene, Courts in this Circuit have found similar delays to be untimely.”
• “[T]here is no persuasive authority which suggests that section 21(g) . . . bars intervention in all SEC enforcement actions.”
• “‘[C]ase law is clear that if an intervenor attempts to introduce collateral issues in a proceeding, a court may be justified in denying a motion to intervene based on undue delay or prejudice.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).