Reeser v. Esmark, Inc., Pension Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although plaintiffs had partial disabilities, they stopped working because of plant closure, not because of disabilities
• where the court applied the arbitrary and capricious test because the plan provided the administrator with “discretion to determine a participant’s eligibility for disability benefits and to construe the plan terms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).