Reese v. Duncan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that compliance with section 86.006 is mandatory
• stating contestant must prove by clear and convincing evidence that “voting irregularities materially affected the outcome of the election”
• construing election statute that expressly stated, “a ballot returned in violation of this section may not be counted.”
• \We do not determine the credibility of any witness or substitute our judgment for that of the trial court.\
• “We do not determine the credibility of any witness or substitute our judgment for that of the trial court.”
• “We do not determine the credibility of any witness or substitute our judgment for that of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).