Reese v. Damato
Citations
- 44 Fla. 692
Syllabus
<p>íl. A writ of error will not, upon the suggestion of the defendant in error, be dismissed on the ground that the transcript of the record shows no jurisdiction in the court iielow because the original affidavit for attachment was not embraced therein, where it contains the amended : affidavit for attachment, defendant’s traverse, thereof, the trial, verdict and judgment for defendant, as directed by ■plaintiff in error, and no additional directions for making up the Vecord were given by defendant.</p> <p>Í2. A defendant in error in a common law proceeding is not entitled to assign or have the appellate court consider alleged errors in the proceedings committed against him by the trial court.</p> <p>S. If an appellate court tries the cause ae novo, enters its own judgment upon such trial and enforces such judgment by its own process, writ of error therefrom will while pending prevent the judgment from which it was taken, being used as an estoppel; but where the court issuing the writ of error does not try the cause de novo, but upon the record upon errors assigned, ^having power to affirm, reverse or modify the judgment appealed from or to enter '¡its own judgment upon the case made by the record alone, even though it possesses power to enforce it by its own process, such writ of error either with or without a supersedeas will not while pending have the effect or suspending or annulling the effect of the judgment from which it was taken so as to divest such judgment of its force as an estoppel.</p> <p>■4. The record oí the judgment of a Circuit Court is not rendered inadmissible in evidence when offered as an estoppel in another action between the same parties, by the fact that when offered in evidence a writ of error therefrom with supersedeas was pending in the Supreme Court.</p> <p>5. A judgment that defendant “go hence” and “recover his costs,” entered upon a verdict for defendant at the trial of the issues raised by plaintiff’s affidavit in attachment and the
Judges: Carter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Estate of Nye v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals· 1973-08-06· cited 38×
- Ames v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Georgia· 2016-03-07· cited 34×
- Estudios, Proyectos e Inversiones de Centro America, S.A. v. Swiss Bank Corporation (Overseas) S.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-02-24· cited 16×
- Epica v. Swiss Bank Corp.(overseas) SaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-23· cited 1×
- Equibank, N. A. v. PenlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-03-18· cited 1×
- International Society for Krishna Consciousness of Miami Beach, Inc. v. RobbinsFlorida Circuit Courts· 1990-09-28
- Cohn v. City of StuartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-11-26
- Kondapalli v. DeMasi (In re DeMasi)M.D. Florida· 2014-12-09
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Butler v. EatonSupreme Court· 1891-05-25· cited 146×
- Bank of North America v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1859-09-15· cited 65×
- Nill v. ComparetIndiana Supreme Court· 1861-05-29· cited 50×
- Day v. HollandOregon Supreme Court· 1887-12-06· cited 41×
- Watson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1899-10-16· cited 33×
- Ransom v. City of PierreEighth Circuit· 1900-04-16· cited 30×
- Powell v. Florida Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 28×
- Glasser, Kuder & Ottensoser v. HackettSupreme Court of Florida· 1896-01-15· cited 23×
- Rogers v. HatchNevada Supreme Court· 1872-04-15· cited 21×
- Moore v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court· 1890-04-22· cited 18×
- Bacon v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida· 1895-06-15· cited 17×
- State ex rel. Merchants National Bank v. HullSupreme Court of Florida· 1896-01-15· cited 8×
Other cases named Reese v. Damato
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.