Reese Exploration, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Williams Natural Gas Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that although the “implied covenant could be interpreted to require an underground gas storage operator to act reasonably. . . the ‘prudent-operator standard’ has not been expressly applied to gas storage leases by Kansas courts”
• \Interpreting written documents is a question of law subject to de novo review.\
• “In interpreting ambiguous documents courts may consider the parties’ conduct as an indication of their contracting intent.”
• \The Kansas Supreme Court held that a public utility is exempt from the rule of capture only after it receive[s] certification . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).