Reeploeg v. Jensen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court may recall its mandate where a lower court has entered a judgment not conforming to the mandate of the appellate court
• noting that to “‘require courts to consider and reconsider cases at the will of litigants would deprive the courts of that stability which is necessary in the administration of justice’” (quoting Kosten v. Fleming, 17 Wn.2d 500, 505, 136 P.2d 449 (1943)
• noting that to \ require courts to consider and reconsider cases at the will of litigants would deprive the courts of that stability which is necessary in the administration ofjustice \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).