Skip to main content

Reeping v. Reeping

Citations

  • 419 A.2d 766
  • 277 Pa. Super. 269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Despite the mislabeling of this claim as new matter, we will treat it as a counterclaim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Hoffman, Van Voort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.