Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 5/2/1980
Reeping v. Reeping
Citations
- 419 A.2d 766
- 277 Pa. Super. 269
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Despite the mislabeling of this claim as new matter, we will treat it as a counterclaim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spaeth, Hoffman, Van Voort
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.