Reems v. Dielman
Citations
- 116 La. 945
- 41 So. 217
- 1906 La. LEXIS 601
Syllabus
<p>Appeal — Decision — Remand, and Procedure Below.</p> <p>This court having simply condemned the •defendant to declare whether she accepted or renounced the succession of her daughter, the lower court erred in requiring her, in addition, to cause an inventory to be made; • especially in a different succession, that of the father of the daughter. The lower court can■not add to the decree of this court.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]o be considered similarly situated the employees must be similarly situated in all relevant respects, taking into account factors such as . . . the nature of the misconduct engaged in.”
- “At the summary judgment stage, a plaintiff advancing a cat’s paw theory based on alleged retaliatory or discriminatory animus of a nondecisionmaker must establish that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to (1) the animus of the subordinate, and (2
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Proyosty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.