Reefshare, Ltd. v. Nagata

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the requirement of “explicitly and prominently” was “intended by the legislature to ensure that the declaration give unequivocal notice to the project unit owners of the authorization for such use”
• stating that \courts will not presume an oversight on the part of the legislature where such presumption is avoidable\
• stating that \courts will not presume an oversight on the part of the legislature where such presumption is avoidable\ (citation omitted)
• stating that “courts will not presume an oversight on the part of the legislature where such presumption is avoidable” (citation omitted)
• \[C]ourts will not presume an oversight on the part of the legislature where such presumption is avoidable.\
• “[C]ourts will not presume an oversight on the part of the legislature where such presumption is avoidable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).