District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/3/1981
Reeder v. State
Citations
- 399 So. 2d 445
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that \[t]he jury could have found that an assault occurred and that the pistol or object used constituted a deadly weapon but that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the pistol met the statutory definition of a 'firearm' \
- reasoning that \[t]he jury could have found that an assault occurred and that the pistol or object used constituted a deadly weapon but that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the pistol met the statutory definition of a 'firearm' \
- \The jury could have found that an assault occurred and that the pistol or object used constituted a deadly weapon but that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the pistol met the statutory definition of a 'firearm.' \
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cowart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sanders v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-31· cited 24×
- Bufford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-08-08· cited 11×
- Wooten v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-16· cited 11×
- Bradfield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-12· cited 4×
- Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-04-18· cited 2×
- MARK AGENOR v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-03-27· cited 1×
- Brunson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-07
- Reath v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-11
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.