Skip to main content
· 1/19/1961

Reeder v. King County

Citations

  • 358 P.2d 810
  • 57 Wash. 2d 563
  • 1961 Wash. LEXIS 400

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a plaintiff is not entitled to relief by way of a declaratory judgment if, otherwise, he has a completely adequate remedy available to him.”
  • relying on Jacobsen for assertion that a plaintiff is not entitled to declaratory relief if a completely adequate remedy is available
  • Dismissing declaratory judgment action because writ of certiorari was available to plaintiffs and would have afforded them all relief to which they may have been entitled in the case.
  • quoted in Seattle-King County Council of Camp Fire v. Department of Revenue, 105 Wn.2d 55, 58, 711 P.2d 300 (1985)
  • “[P]laintiff is not entitled to relief by way of a declaratory judgment if, otherwise, he has a completely adequate remedy available to him”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Finley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.