Reeder v. Carroll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting the Iowa Supreme Court abandoned the four-factor test in Barreca in favor of the Restatement approach
• applying § 598 and recognizing “important interest in ensuring the competency and safety of physicians practicing in Iowa”
• finding a doctor’s statements to the board of medicine were qualifiedly privileged because the board and the public “share a sufficiently important interest in ensuring the competency and safety of physicians practicing in the state of Iowa”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).