Skip to main content
· 7/1/1850

Reed v. Tay

Citations

  • 32 Me. 173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that evidence of other crimes may be admitted to show, among other things, motive, and intent to commit a charged offense
  • holding that evidence of other acts of a defendant may be admissible to “explain a witness’s delay in reporting a matter”
  • supporting admissibility to show motive or to present complete and coherent picture of events
  • noting as a matter of due process that “[t]he State is required to prove the elements of the offense it charged, not the one it might have charged” (internal citations omitted)
  • trial error “creates a rebuttable presumption of prejudice [and the] state may rebut this presumption by proving that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”
  • sexual intercourse “necessarily involve[s] ... ‘touching another person with [the defendant’s] genitals,’ ” and thus falls within the definition of “sexual contact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wells

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.