Skip to main content

Reed v. State

Citations

  • 500 S.W.2d 497
  • 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1893

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that article 36.01 “specifies the order of proceeding in a jury trial” and does not address the procedures applicable in the penalty stage of a bifurcated trial when punishment is tried to the 5 court alone
  • observing that if appellant had objected to trial court’s procedures during punishment hearing, any “problem could have been easily remedied” at that time
  • overruling complaint challenging whether was arraigned and that ‘he pleaded to the indictment,’ when the record revealed appellant had been arraigned and that appellant had pleaded to the indictment but that he failed to 15 complain about it at trial
  • when punishment is before trial court, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure does not require reading of enhancement paragraphs and receipt of plea to enhancement paragraphs
  • “At the hearing on punishment, while represented by retained counsel, appellant stipulated to the truthfulness of the enhancement portion of the indictment. It would be difficult to say that he was misled as to that with which he was charged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Onion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.