Skip to main content

Reed v. State

Citations

  • 847 S.W.2d 34
  • 312 Ark. 82
  • 1993 Ark. LEXIS 97

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that any possible prejudice caused by the state’s failure to comply with the pretrial discovery rule would have been cured by a continuance, and since the trial court offered appellant a continuance before any testimony was presented, which he declined, there was no error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corbin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.