Reed v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The legislature's choice not to include such language, which could have easily been added to the statute, indicates the legislature's intent not to bring such conduct within the purview of this offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brock v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2016-01-07· cited 35×
• Joseph Glen Dauben v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2014-06-05
• Brenton W. Shadden v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2011-05-20
• Andrea Gordon v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2010-03-24

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Boykin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-09· cited 1,829×
• Hicks v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-12-12· cited 27×
• GARY CARLTON CAMP v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1995-10-30· cited 14×
• Reed v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2007-02-13· cited 6×