Reed v. Ryburn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[B]ecause this court concludes that the railroad . . . drew up the deeds, . . . any ambiguity in the . . . Deeds must be interpreted in the grantors’ favor.”
• “As the Kershaw court did not consider both references to the phrase ‘right of way’ in the {Ray] deed when drawing a distinction between the [Ray] deed and the deed under review in Kershaw ... [,] the footnote in Kershaw is not persuasive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).