Skip to main content
· 6/25/1962

Reed v. Rhay

Citations

  • 370 U.S. 948

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Matsushita directs us “ ‘to consider whether the inference of conspiracy is reasonable’”
  • Monsanto and Matsushita do not apply when challenged action is overtly anticompetitive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.