Reed v. Reed
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4857
Syllabus
Domestic relations court did not err by denying motion to modify agreed divorce decree. The requested modification did not satisfy the requirements of R.C. 3105.171(I) because there was not express written consent or agreement to the modification by both spouses. Even if not barred by statute, appellant was not entitled to the requested relief under Civ.R. 60(B) because her motion was untimely, having been filed more than eight years after the agreed divorce decree was entered.
Judges: Dorrian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Knapp v. KnappOhio Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 154×
- State Ex Rel. Shisler v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement SystemOhio Supreme Court· 2009-06-04· cited 27×
- Dach v. HomewoodOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-08· cited 19×
- Walsh v. Walsh (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-09-18· cited 19×
- Campbell v. 1 Spring, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-30· cited 6×
- Lane v. U.S. Bank N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-08· cited 2×
- Dutton v. DuttonOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-06-03· cited 2×
- Dimitrievska v. DimitrievskiOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-05-29· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.