Skip to main content

Reed v. Reed

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 4857

Syllabus

Domestic relations court did not err by denying motion to modify agreed divorce decree. The requested modification did not satisfy the requirements of R.C. 3105.171(I) because there was not express written consent or agreement to the modification by both spouses. Even if not barred by statute, appellant was not entitled to the requested relief under Civ.R. 60(B) because her motion was untimely, having been filed more than eight years after the agreed divorce decree was entered.

Judges: Dorrian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.