· 4/11/1995
Reed v. Mitchell & Timbanard, P.C.
Citations
- 903 P.2d 621
- 183 Ariz. 313
- 188 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 48
- 1995 Ariz. App. LEXIS 87
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a claim for legal malpractice accrues when the. “plaintiffs damages are ascertainable, and not speculative or contingent”
- “We hold that simple legal malpractice resulting in pecuniary loss which in turn causes emotional upset, even with physical symptoms, will not support a claim for damages for emotional distress.”
- presence of a judge as a witness on behalf of a party may be prejudicial to the rights of the opposing party
- “The jury, as the trier of fact, has the duty to determine what a reasonable judge would have done.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kleinschmidt, Noyes, Garbarino
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.