Skip to main content
· 4/11/1995

Reed v. Mitchell & Timbanard, P.C.

Citations

  • 903 P.2d 621
  • 183 Ariz. 313
  • 188 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 48
  • 1995 Ariz. App. LEXIS 87

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a claim for legal malpractice accrues when the. “plaintiffs damages are ascertainable, and not speculative or contingent”
  • “We hold that simple legal malpractice resulting in pecuniary loss which in turn causes emotional upset, even with physical symptoms, will not support a claim for damages for emotional distress.”
  • presence of a judge as a witness on behalf of a party may be prejudicial to the rights of the opposing party
  • “The jury, as the trier of fact, has the duty to determine what a reasonable judge would have done.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kleinschmidt, Noyes, Garbarino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.