Reed v. Mineta Ex Rel. United States Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the plaintiff’s “monetary injuries were incrementally inflicted from the date of his termination through entry of judgment” and that “prejudgment interest should have been calculated to coincide therewith”
• “The purpose of making discrimination victims whole is limited, however, by recognition that prejudgment interest does not accrue until the victim actually sustains monetary injury.”
• “As a general rule, district courts ‘should calculate interest on back pay and past damages based on the date of the adverse employment action.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).