Skip to main content
· 6/19/2003

Reed v. MBNA Marketing Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 333 F.3d 27
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12311
  • 92 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 98
  • 2003 WL 21403692

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that employer’s affirmative defense of reasonableness “is itself a jury issue unless no reasonable jury could decide it in the plaintiff’s favor”
  • holding that employer’s affirmative defense of reasonableness “is itself a jury issue unless no reasonable jury could decide it in the plaintiff’s favor”
  • finding that defendant had satisfied the first prong of the defense where plaintiff could not show that defendant “lacked a substantial antiharassment program”
  • finding that defendant had satisfied the first prong of the defense where plaintiff could not show that defendant “lacked a substantial antiharassment program”.
  • affirming district court's summary judgment determination that defendant satisfied the first element of the defense by promulgating an anti-harassment policy with a complaint procedure
  • constructive discharge qualifies as a tangible employment action only when effected through a supervisor's official act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Lipez, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.