Reed v. Lear Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff's alleged reliance on an employer's purportedly unclear statement in a letter about certain Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA
• holding that an employee’s reliance was unreasonable when, in the face of conflicting messages, he “could have easily sought clarification from” his employer
• holding that the statute of limitations began to run when plaintiff was allegedly improperly denied leave because an improper denial of leave constitutes a violation of the FMLA
• clock started running on FMLA interference claim when employer gave employee second letter denying FMLA leave rather than later date of termination
• clock started running on FMLA interference claim when employer gave employee second letter denying FMLA leave rather than later date of termination
• “An FMLA violation occurs when an employer improperly denies a request for leave.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).