Reed v. Iowa Marine and Repair Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that the purpose of obligation to supplement is to prevent prejudice and surprise
• Our reading of [Rule 26(e)] is consistent with the Rule’s basic purpose of preventing prejudice and surprise . . . .”
• “Our reading of Rule 26(e)(2) and (3) is consistent with the Rule's basic purpose of preventing prejudice and surprise, neither of which occurred in the case at bar.”
• “Rule 60(b)(2) provides relief when the movant presents 17 newly discovered evidence that could not have been discovered earlier and that is relevant 18 to the merits of the litigation.”
• “On these facts, the defendant could not have been caught unprepared due to any delay by Barker. There manifestly was no prejudice or surprise. The purposes of Rule 26(e) were not frustrated by Barker’s conduct.”
• the “basic purpose” of Rule 26(e) is to “prevent[] prejudice and surprise”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).