Reed v. Dunham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[O]nce it is determined . . . that a particular claim is not subject to dismissal [for frivolousness] under 3 In 1996, Congress amended 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Pub. L. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, 1321-73 to 1321-75 (1996). Subsection 1915(d) became § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).