· 10/3/2011
Reed v. Donahoe
Citations
- 181 L. Ed. 2d 154
- 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5213
- 132 S. Ct. 263
- 565 U.S. 887
- 80 U.S.L.W. 3188
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting facial vagueness challenge regarding term \loiter\ because the statute was \simply a park closure law\ banning presence
- rejecting facial vagueness challenge regarding term “loiter” because the statute was “simply a park closure law” banning presence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.