Skip to main content
· 7/10/1963

Reed v. Buck

Citations

  • 370 S.W.2d 867

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining simply because certain cases had “not been cited in recent years,” such “ancient cases” do not “just fade[] away”; instead, “unless there is some good reason for overruling them, they should not be disregarded”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norvell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.