Reed v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioner's original argument was too general to alert the board to the specific argument petitioner asserted on appeal though the essence of the argument was the same
• finding petitioner’s argument unpreserved where it was “simply too general to alert the board to the more specific argument he now asserts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).