Reed Construction Corp. v. Reed Construction Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the Supreme Court’s earliest uses of the King’s Bench powers , commonly implicated the common law writs of mandamus and prohibition
• explaining the separate constitutional functions of the Judicial Conduct Board, Court of Judicial Discipline and Pennsylvania Supreme Court
• explaining the separate constitutional functions of the Judicial Conduct Board, Court of Judicial Discipline and Pennsylvania Supreme Court
• providing Court may assume King’s Bench jurisdiction “where no dispute is pending in a lower court” and may do so “sua sponte”
• “King’s Bench authority is not limited by prescribed forms of procedure . . .; the Court may employ any type of process or procedure necessary for the circumstances.”
• “King’s Bench authority is not limited by prescribed forms of procedure . . .; the Court may employ any type of process or procedure necessary for the circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).