REED, CHARLES, PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that chalk lines occupying the tires of a parked vehicle was a “trespass” to chattel
• finding that chalking a car tire was a search because it constituted a trespass to chattel at common law and was done with an investigatory purpose
• finding city’s chalking of tires to determine how long a vehicle had been parked in the same location constituted a search under Jones
• reversing dismissal where the defendant failed “to meet its burden in establishing an exception to the warrant requirement”
• reiterating that requirement three years after Couch’s warrantless entry
• reversing dismissal of § 1983 action where the plaintiff alleged a warrantless search and the defendant failed “to meet its burden in establishing an exception to the warrant requirement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).