Ree Clay and Ruby Chivers v. Iver R. Johnson and Marvin Bilfeld, D/B/A Davenport Construction Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an agency rule clarifying an unsettled area of law may be applied to case at hand
• discussing Comment 18(g)4. and the elimination of the \prohibition on disclosing the beginning payment date by referring to a specified event\
• discussing Comment 18(g)4. and the elimination of the \prohibition on disclosing the beginning payment date by referring to a specified event\
• the Federal Reserve Board’s official staff commentary to Reg- ulation Z is dispositive in TILA cases unless the commen- tary is demonstrably irrational
• “A clarifying rule, therefore, can be applied to the case at hand just as a judicial determination construing a statute can be applied to the case at hand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).