Redwine's v. Redwine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that CRA acted willfully because it failed to follow the plain meaning of the statute
• denying motion to dismiss because there were “questions of fact regarding the actual state of decision-making at [the defendant] that the Court cannot resolve on a motion to dismiss”
• “It is our view that Congress intended that the disclosure not be encumbered with extraneous information.”
• “When the document reflects a factual issue (such as an email correspondence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).