Redondo-Borges v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no property interest existed for a disapIpdo.inted bidder who was awarded a contract that the state later rescinded
• recognizing that “[a] recurrent theme in this court’s jurisprudence” supported a holding that the plaintiffs’ interest in a rescinded bid award “d[id] not rise to the level of a constitutionally protected property interest”
• stating that the exception also permits injunctive relief against state defendants in their individual capacities
• noting that \additional allegations\ in plaintiffs' opposition to the motions to dismiss were \not properly before us\
• concluding no legitimate property interest in awarded bid even when bid was awarded and then revoked
• declining to reach the question of whether a de facto debarment implicates a liberty interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).