Skip to main content
· 10/6/2005

Redmond v. Socha

Citations

  • 837 N.E.2d 883
  • 216 Ill. 2d 622
  • 297 Ill. Dec. 432
  • 2005 Ill. LEXIS 980

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff bears the burden of proving every necessary element of her negligence case by a preponderance of the evidence
  • “whether two verdicts are legally inconsistent is a question of law” which “is subject to de novo review”
  • plaintiff bears the burden of proving every necessary element of her negligence case by a preponderance of the evidence
  • “[WJhether two verdicts are legally inconsistent is a question of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.