· 10/6/2005
Redmond v. Socha
Citations
- 837 N.E.2d 883
- 216 Ill. 2d 622
- 297 Ill. Dec. 432
- 2005 Ill. LEXIS 980
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plaintiff bears the burden of proving every necessary element of her negligence case by a preponderance of the evidence
- “whether two verdicts are legally inconsistent is a question of law” which “is subject to de novo review”
- plaintiff bears the burden of proving every necessary element of her negligence case by a preponderance of the evidence
- “[WJhether two verdicts are legally inconsistent is a question of law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.