Skip to main content
· 5/16/1991

Redmond v. McCool

Citations

  • 582 So. 2d 262
  • 1991 WL 91038

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where defendant, who made statement both false and defamatory per se, successfully rebutted the presumption of malice by showing reasonable basis for statement
  • communication accusing plaintiff of “theft,” even if defamatory per se, was protected by qualified privilege where communication was made in good faith

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Savoie, Crain and Foil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.