Skip to main content
· 11/18/2008

Redmon v. Sud-Chemie Inc. Retirement Plan for Union Employees

Citations

  • 547 F.3d 531
  • 45 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1577
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 23713
  • 2008 WL 4911160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that KRS § 413.120(2) only applies if a statute creates a theory of liability that was unknown at common law and further noting that because negligence was available at common law, “Kentucky courts have declined to apply KRS § 413.120(2) to negligence claims”
  • “ERISA does not provide a statute of limitations for a claim for benefits under § 1132(a)(1)(B)”
  • “ERISA does not provide a statute of limitations for a claim for benefits under § 1132(a)(1)(B)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole and Gibbons, Circuit Judges Forester, Senior District Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.