Redlands Orange Growers Ass'n v. Gorman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a trial court must exercise discretion to determine whether to accept a \sham\ affidavit
• holding in reviewing a circuit court's decision to exclude a sham affidavit, our court uses an abuse of discretion standard
• finding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding a “sham affidavit” that contradicted the appellant’s testimony when the affidavit was submitted two days before the summary judgment hearing
• noting South Carolina has adopted 1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. the abuse of discretion standard in reviewing whether a lower court properly rejected an affidavit as a sham
• \Summary judgment is appropriate when a plaintiff does not commence an action within the applicable statute of limitations.\
• \Summary judgment is appropriate when a plaintiff does not commence an action within the applicable statute of limitations.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).